Comic Book Continuity, Important or Not?
If you visit any comic book fan forum on the net, I guarantee there will be one particularly debate raging. The exact books and characters referred to change, but the basic argument remains the same. This person is written out of character because back in issue #154987 so and so said blah blah blah.
I’m exaggerating of course. I don’t think any comic has an issue #154987. But it does serve to illustrate the dilemma that comic book publishes frequently find themselves in.
The Continuity Conundrum
In essence, the problem is that most comic book universes (and I’m thinking primarily of DC and Marvel here) are built around the concept of continuity. All their characters interact to a greater or lesser extent with each other. They all exist in the same universe (though not necessarily the same planet or even plane) and as a result they share a common history.
However as more and more stories are published about these characters, it becomes harder and harder to track exactly who knows what and why never mind considering the effects it might have on the characterization of a specific hero. And that doesn’t even address the limiting effect as far as possible new stories are concerned.
So what you have is two different requirements tugging away at the publisher. They want to do something new with their characters and they want also to stay true to what has come before or they risk losing what made those characters special in the first place. The longer a character is published the bigger this problem becomes.
The Role Of The Fans
Long time comics fans often taken an excessive interest in continuity as a by product of their interest in the subject as a whole. This frequently results in fans complaining when a comic book publisher breaks continuity (deliberately or through ignorance).
Increasingly the outcry from fandom has made it seem as though continuity breaks are enough on their own to make or break a story. Of course this is not a realistic view of things. Continuity is merely one aspect of many that make up a good comic book. To make matters more confusing the importance of continuity will vary dramatically depending on the particular reader.
One Problem, Two Solutions
So you’re a comic book publisher with 40+ years of history working for and against you. What do you do? So far two approaches have been tried.
DC Comics has experienced some success with periodic reboots of continuity. The first of these was the Crisis on Infinite Earths which wiped out many parallel worlds and redefined a number of its major superheroes (and villains). More recently they rebooted again with Infinite Crisis which again redefined a number of their most prominent characters as well as introducing brand new versions of old characters.
While this method has allowed DC to keep a fairly clean and consistent continuity, it also has the effect of upsetting and alienating some of their longer term readers as characters they liked get wiped out of existence.
Marvel Comics has so far avoided any universe wide reboots by instead adopting a policy of selective continuity. With this method the individual editors or writers choose to acknowledge or simply not reference various elements of Marvel history as they think best suits their story.
While the concept is highly flexible there have been many occasions where the resulting story chooses to ignore an element so significant that it makes the story look silly. Characters who were thought to be dead turn up alive with not the slightest reference to how they returned.
Important or Not?
So is it? Well yes, and no. Fundamentally continuity is as important as the reader chooses to let it be. While I have the greatest respect for writers who can weave stories entirely within established continuity, I’d rather have a good story that breaks continuity than suffer through an average story that sticks faithfully to everything that has gone before.
Eoghann Irving is amongst other things the creator and Editor of Solar Flare. He has a life long interest in all forms of science fiction and fantasy and a pressing need to share this interest with anyone who will listen. Find out more at his personal website eoghann.com..








2 Comments, Comment or Ping
Dave Derby
Continuity -
I think I’ve always liked about serialized shows of any kind is that the show is
made up of people who inevitably age. Aging forces certain plot decisions that
fiction can ignore. I’ve been away for comics for 13 years. I recently started again
as something to do with my 8 year old son. Oddly, I didn’t miss much as far as
characterization and plot. The long-term result of that, I think, is that the characters
get stale. How can Peter Parker still be interesting when he has aged about 10 years
since the early 60s? Answer: He’s not. My thought is that the characters should age
and new blood can be brought in via Peter having a kid with spider powers or something
like that. I like the Ultimate or Marvel Adventures for where the myth exists forever.
But, if Spider Man is going to get separated and Tony Stark is going to have a drinking
problem, they might as well get old and pass on their legacy. If I want to see
classic Star Trek, I’ll watch the DVD. If I want classic Spidey, I’ll just read
old issues. I was amazed by the number of WWII references in the current comics.
History is good, but it was 60 years ago! Move forward! Get old! Of course, this all
may be the rant of a man entering middle age, but I accept that as well.
Sep 25th, 2006
Reply to “Comic Book Continuity, Important or Not?”